Please enter a valid ZIP Code.
No additional import charges at delivery! This item will be shipped through the Global Shipping Program and includes international tracking.
- About the Book;
- Rise of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment (Routledge Studies in the History of Economics, 56).
- Corpus of Maya Hieroglyphic Inscriptions, Volume 3, Part 1: Yaxchilan.
- Third or Additional Language Acquisition (Second Language Acquisition);
Learn more - opens in a new window or tab. There are 1 items available. Please enter a number less than or equal to 1. Select a valid country. Please enter 5 or 9 numbers for the ZIP Code. Handling time. Will usually ship within 3 business days of receiving cleared payment - opens in a new window or tab. Taxes may be applicable at checkout.
Learn more. Return policy. Refer to eBay Return policy for more details. You are covered by the eBay Money Back Guarantee if you receive an item that is not as described in the listing. Payment details. Payment methods. Other offers may also be available.
Interest will be charged to your account from the purchase date if the balance is not paid in full within 6 months.
Minimum monthly payments are required. Subject to credit approval. See terms - opens in a new window or tab. This is a private listing and your identity will not be disclosed to anyone except the seller. Back to home page Return to top. Back to home page.
Listed in category:. Email to friends Share on Facebook - opens in a new window or tab Share on Twitter - opens in a new window or tab Share on Pinterest - opens in a new window or tab Add to Watchlist.
Opens image gallery Image not available Photos not available for this variation. Acceptable : A book with obvious wear. These would make a good reference source but if you are looking for a presentation set I would not recommend them. International Priority Shipping. Seller does not offer returns. The text of each volume presents descriptive information about the sites and monuments and their associated artifacts. Get A Copy. Paperback , 64 pages.
More Details Original Title. Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Community Reviews.
Showing Rating details. All Languages. More filters. Carved and molded glyphs were painted, but the paint has rarely survived. Maya texts were usually written in blocks arranged in columns two blocks wide, with each block corresponding to a noun or verb phrase. The blocks within the columns were read left to right, top to bottom, and would be repeated until there were no more columns left. Within a block, glyphs were arranged top-to-bottom and left-to-right similar to Korean Hangul syllabic blocks.
Corpus of Maya Hieroglyphic Inscriptions, Volume 1: Introduction
Glyphs were sometimes conflated into ligatures , where an element of one glyph would replace part of a second. In place of the standard block configuration, Maya was also sometimes written in a single row or column, or in an 'L' or 'T' shape. These variations most often appeared when they would better fit the surface being inscribed. The Maya script was a logosyllabic system with some syllabogrammatic elements.
Individual glyphs or symbols could represent either a morpheme or a syllable , and the same glyph could often be used for both. Because of these dual readings, it is customary to write logographic readings in all caps and phonetic readings in italics or bold. Glyphs used as syllabograms were originally logograms for single-syllable words, usually those that ended in a vowel or in a weak consonant such as y, w, h, or glottal stop. For example, the logogram for 'fish fin'—found in two forms, as a fish fin and as a fish with prominent fins—was read as [kah] and came to represent the syllable ka.
These syllabic glyphs performed two primary functions: as phonetic complements to disambiguate logograms which had more than one reading similar to ancient Egyptian and modern Japanese furigana ; and to write grammatical elements such as verbal inflections which did not have dedicated logograms similar to Japanese okurigana.
In addition, some syllable glyphs were homophones , such as the 6 different glyphs used to write the very common third person pronoun u-. It is possible, but not certain, that these conflicting readings arose as the script was adapted to new languages similar to Japanese kanji and Assyro-Babylonian and Hittite cuneiform. Phonetic glyphs stood for simple consonant-vowel CV or vowel-only V syllables. However, Mayan phonotactics is slightly more complicated than this. More often, final consonants were written, which meant that an extra vowel was written as well.
This was typically an "echo" vowel that repeated the vowel of the previous syllable. For example, the word [kah] 'fish fin' would be underspelled ka or written in full as ka-ha. However, there are many cases where some other vowel was used, and the orthographic rules for this are only partially understood; this is largely due to the difficulty in ascertaining whether this vowel may be due to an underspelled suffix.
In short, if the vowels are the same harmonic , a simple vowel is intended. The long-vowel reading of [Ce-Ci] is still uncertain, and there is a possibility that [Ce-Cu] represents a glottalized vowel if it is not simply an underspelling for [CeCuC] , so it may be that the disharmonies form natural classes: [i] for long non-front vowels, otherwise [a] to keep it disharmonic; [u] for glottalized non-back vowels, otherwise [a].
Despite depending on consonants which were frequently not written, the Mayan voice system was reliably indicated. For instance, the paradigm for a transitive verb with a CVC root is as follows:. An "emblem glyph" is a kind of royal title. It consists of a word ajaw —a Classic Maya term for "lord", with an unclear etymology but well-attested in Colonial sources  —and a place name that precedes the word ajaw and functions as an adjective.
Expressions such as "Boston lord" would be a perfect English analogy. This title was identified in by Heinrich Berlin , who coined the term "emblem glyph". Berlin also noticed that while the smaller elements remained relatively constant, the main sign changed from site to site. Berlin proposed that the main signs identified individual cities, their ruling dynasties, or the territories they controlled. Subsequently, Marcus argued that the "emblem glyphs" referred to archaeological sites, or more so the prominence and standing of the site, broken down in a 5-tiered hierarchy of asymmetrical distribution.
Marcus' research assumed that the emblem glyphs were distributed in a pattern of relative site importance depending on broadness of distribution, roughly broken down as follows: Primary regional centers capitals Tikal , Calakmul , and other "superpowers" were generally first in the region to acquire a unique emblem glyph s. Texts referring to other primary regional centers occur in the texts of these "capitals", and dependencies exist which use the primary center's glyph.
Secondary centers Altun Ha , Lubaantun , Xunantunich , and other mid-sized cities had their own glyphs but are only rarely mentioned in texts found in the primary regional center, while repeatedly mentioning the regional center in their own texts. Tertiary centers towns had no glyphs of their own, but have texts mentioning the primary regional centers and perhaps secondary regional centers on occasion. These were followed by the villages with no emblem glyphs and no texts mentioning the larger centers, and hamlets with little evidence of texts at all.
The authors demonstrated that there were lots of place-names-proper, some real, some mythological, mentioned in the hieroglyphic inscriptions. Some of these place names also appeared in the "emblem glyphs", some were attested in the "titles of origin" various expressions like "a person from Boston" , but some were not incorporated in personal titles at all.
Corpus of Maya Hieroglyphic Inscriptions, Paperback by Graham, Ian Vol | eBay
Moreover, the authors also highlighted the cases when the "titles of origin" and the "emblem glyphs" did not overlap, building upon Houston's earlier research. The Mayas used a positional base-twenty vigesimal numerical system which only included whole numbers. For simple counting operations, a bar and dot notation was used.
- A Short Grammar of Tetun Dili (Languages of the World Materials, 388).
- Shop by category.
- Kids Inventing!: A Handbook for Young Inventors;
- Corpus of Maya Hieroglyphic Inscriptions, Volume 1: Introduction.
The dot represents 1 and the bar represents 5.
Related Corpus of Maya Hieroglyphic Inscriptions 1
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved